Albania under construction 1995 – 2024

The construction sector in Albania has played a central role in the country’s economic and urban transformation over the past three decades, acting as both a driver of growth and a reflection of structural imbalances.

From the post-communist liberalization of the 1990s to the post-earthquake and pandemic rebound of the 2020s, construction activity has followed the contours of macroeconomic shifts, demographic change, and speculative investment patterns.

While contributing significantly to employment, infrastructure, and housing supply, the sector now faces critical challenges related to overconcentration, environmental degradation, and misaligned capital allocation. The phenomenon of excessive construction density, especially in urban hubs like Tirana has intensified spatial inequality and strained public services, raising urgent questions about sustainability, planning, and equitable development.

This analysis unpacks the evolution, structure, and consequences of Albania’s construction sector from 1995 to 2024, identifying key trends, distortions, and pathways for reform.

I. Strategic and economic significance of construction in Albania (1995–2024)

1. Economic driver & growth engine

  • GDP Linkage: Construction consistently aligned with macroeconomic cycles—fueling growth in booms (2000–2007, 2017–2024) and absorbing shocks in downturns (2008–2013, 2020).
  • Employment Generator: Labor-intensive sector, especially during expansion phases.
  • Urban Transformation: Engine of urban renewal, housing expansion, and infrastructural development.

2. Five chronological phases of sector evolution

PeriodKey TrendsTotal Area Built (m²)Investment Value (ALL)Cost (ALL/m²)
1995–2000Modest start, unstable4.3M98.7B22.88K
2000–2007Liberalization & FDI inflow14.46M368.76B25.51K
2008–2012Global crisis contraction11.93M20.1B (2012 low)28.48K
2013–2019Recovery via public policy7M70.78B (peak 2015)35.31K
2020–2024Pandemic shock & rebound11.2M106.4B (record 2024)37.79K

II. Structure of built spaces: housing vs economic activities

a. Residential construction

Total (1995–2024): 36.29 million m² (≈75% of permits)

Drivers: Urbanization, family fragmentation, diaspora investments.

Demographic Mismatch: Despite emigration and population decline, housing permits grew → surplus housing.

b. Economic construction

Total: 12.63 million m²

Links: Closely follows sectoral trends in tourism, logistics, light industry.

Underperformance: Compared to GDP growth from $1.2B (1995) → $25.5B (2024), the share of productive space remains limited.

III. Construction density and regional disparities

a. Geographic Concentration & urban density

Construction density crisis

  • 51% of all permits and built area is concentrated in Tirana, Kamëz, and Vorë.
  • High-rise proliferation and vertical expansion, often exceeding urban infrastructure capacity.
  • Density far surpasses EU norms → leads to congestion, pollution, and reduced livability.

Environmental and urban stress

  • Tirana emits 800,000 tons CO/year from construction.
  • Urban heat islands, traffic saturation, and degraded public services.

b. Uneven development

  • High Activity Zones: Tirana, Durrës, Vlora, Saranda, and coastal tourism belts.
  • Lagging Regions: Kukës, Dibra, Elbasan highlands → face underinvestment and depopulation.
  • Result: Structural spatial inequality driven by speculative rather than strategic urban growth.

IV. Environmental & Health externalities

1. Environmental costs

  • Air and Water Pollution: €900M/year in health costs; 1.2M people exposed to PM2.5/PM10.
  • CO Emissions: Total national emissions from construction ~1.3 million tons/year.
  • Biodiversity Loss: Urban sprawl impacts protected areas and farmland.

2. Health & Agricultural damage

Impact CategoryAnnual Cost
Health (pollution-related)€900M
Accidents & workplace injury50M ALL
Agricultural losses (land/water)€3.1M
Tourism-related degradation€1.9M

V. Housing stock & Capital misallocation

1. Oversupply vs Demand

  • Total stock: 72.6 million m² (built + under construction)
  • Vacant units: 21.78 million m² (≈30%)
  • Actual demand: ~11 million m² (from diaspora and foreign buyers)
  • Surplus: ~10.78 million m², indicating no need for mass new construction.

2. Locked Capital

  • Massive capital (~€3–4B) locked in unsold speculative housing.
  • Creates a non-productive economy, misallocating financial and human resources.

VI. Strategic outlook & Policy scenarios

Scenario Analysis

ScenarioDriversConstruction GrowthGDP Impact
🟢 OptimisticSubsidies, low interest5–7%+€1.5B
🟡 ConservativeInflation, high interest2–4%+€750M
🔴 PessimisticConfidence loss, stagnationNegative/stagnant

Recommendations

Reallocate capital: Invest in productive sectors: manufacturing, tech, agrotourism.

Use existing stock: Convert excess housing into social housing or long-term rentals.

Urban planning reform:

  • Moratoriums in oversupplied areas.
  • Limit height, density, and location of new builds.

Sustainable construction:

  • Use of solar panels, geothermal systems, green materials.
  • Green public infrastructure and incentives for energy efficiency.

Balanced regional growth:

  • Prioritize investments in underdeveloped areas with public-private partnerships.
  • Stimulate employment and reduce migration pressure.

 

📢 Albania’s construction sector must pivot from speculative urban overbuilding—centered on dense, unsustainable development—toward strategic, regionally balanced, and environmentally conscious growth. This involves rechanneling capital, enforcing tighter regulations, and aligning construction with real demand and sustainable development goals.

🛑 No new construction needed where vacancy exceeds demand.

🟢 Yes to green, productive, and regionally inclusive development.

Description

Title: Albania Under Construction 1995–2024 – Between Economic Growth and Environmental Challenge

The ALTAX publication “Albania Under Construction 1995–2024” provides a comprehensive analysis of the construction sector’s evolution and its multifaceted impact on Albania’s economy, environment, and society over the last three decades. The report critically assesses how construction has transitioned from a post-communist development engine into one of the main pillars of the national economy, while also examining the hidden costs it has generated.

Key Focus Areas:

  1. Sectoral Overview (1995–2024)
    The construction sector has significantly driven Albania’s GDP growth, urban expansion, and employment, particularly in the last decade. However, the boom has often lacked strategic planning and sustainable integration.

  2. Economic Contribution (2019–2024)
    A deep dive into the recent years shows heightened activity and investments, particularly in urban centers. Yet, this expansion is not always matched by regulatory enforcement or environmental standards.

  3. Environmental and Social Impacts

    • Air Pollution & Public Health: Increased construction has contributed to deteriorating air quality, with direct health consequences for urban populations.

    • CO₂ Emissions & Climate Change: Rapid urbanization has intensified Albania’s climate footprint, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions.

    • Agricultural Displacement: Construction expansion into peri-urban and rural zones has reduced arable land and threatened biodiversity.

  4. Pathways to Sustainable Construction

    • The report identifies a transition opportunity: promoting renewable energy, green building materials, and eco-technologies that align economic growth with environmental responsibility.

    • Encouraging environmentally friendly practices could mitigate current damages and open new investment avenues in green infrastructure.

  5. Challenges and Prospects
    The sector faces regulatory, financial, and institutional barriers. Clearer government strategies, incentives for sustainable construction, and public-private coordination are necessary for long-term resilience.

  6. Conclusions and Recommendations
    The report urges policymakers, environmental stakeholders, and industry professionals to:

    • Promote urban planning based on sustainability.

    • Incentivize green investments.

    • Strengthen regulatory enforcement and intersectoral coordination.

Audience: This analysis is aimed at construction professionals, urban planners, environmental activists, decision-makers, and informed citizens who seek a balanced understanding of the construction sector’s impact and its future trajectory in Albania.

Purpose: To inform, engage, and provoke thoughtful discussion on how Albania can transform its construction boom into a sustainable and equitable development model.

This summary reflects the structured and analytical approach of the ALTAX report, combining macroeconomic insights with environmental and social evaluations, and calling for a responsible, future-oriented construction paradigm.